Lauren Green is the worse person to be working on this story. She's an extremely religious Christian and you can see how much on a Fox News article titled 'The Inaccuracy of Kathy Griffin's Remarks on Jesus'. Lauren Green actually says, "...<span> I want to actually show you that, in fact, Kathy Griffin is wrong. Jesus had everything to do with her winning that award. Here's the link to the article. <span>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296683,00.html </span></span> Can Fox News find a less bias person to report on religion?
I particularly love how they "accidentally" left off the -lor on Annie Laurie Gaylor's name, obviously to give thier audience just that much more of twinge of revulsion at her mere existance. Bunch of fucking lying, craven shitbags.
<img></img> <span>Sean </span><span></span><img></img> <span>I dont really care what standards the post office have. They are a governmental body and so are governed by the constitution. They are not alowed to endorse a religion. I belive this would include endorsing a religous figure. HOWEVER I do not think a religous figure should be precluded because some of their notoriety is religous in nature. Martin Luter King is righfully a stamp REGARDLESS of his religous affilaition. The argument could be made that Mother Terisa was a humanitarian however i would strongly dissagree. If the case was made that she was a humanitarian however i would have little problem with her induction.</span>
Lauren Green is the worse person to be working on this story. She's an extremely religious Christian and you can see how much on a Fox News article titled 'The Inaccuracy of Kathy Griffin's Remarks on Jesus'. Lauren Green actually says, "...<span> I want to actually show you that, in fact, Kathy Griffin is wrong. Jesus had everything to do with her winning that award. Here's the link to the article. <span>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296683,00.html </span></span>
ReplyDeleteCan Fox News find a less bias person to report on religion?
~WillQuestion
They should have invited Hitchens to discuss this. He would have talked their ears off.
ReplyDeletefaux news - now there's a surprise
ReplyDeleteIs Hitchens still silent about this? Hmmm, maybe he is just likes the idea of spitting at her every time he sends a letter... ;)
ReplyDeleteOh, yes. Mother Teresa and her wonderful "humanitarian work".
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/v/p3tUuA7WBRE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="170" height="140
I particularly love how they "accidentally" left off the -lor on Annie Laurie Gaylor's name, obviously to give thier audience just that much more of twinge of revulsion at her mere existance. Bunch of fucking lying, craven shitbags.
ReplyDeleteThanks Joeyess (& Penn& Teller).
ReplyDeleteFreedom from religion needs to pick their battles more carefully!
ReplyDeleteThere is no religious message on the stamp, just a portrayal of a well liked character!
<img></img>
ReplyDelete<img></img> <span>Sean </span><span></span><img></img>
<span>I dont really care what standards the post office have. They are a governmental body and so are governed by the constitution. They are not alowed to endorse a religion. I belive this would include endorsing a religous figure. HOWEVER I do not think a religous figure should be precluded because some of their notoriety is religous in nature. Martin Luter King is righfully a stamp REGARDLESS of his religous affilaition. The argument could be made that Mother Terisa was a humanitarian however i would strongly dissagree. If the case was made that she was a humanitarian however i would have little problem with her induction.</span>
At least now the old bitch will get a licking....something she would have never had in her lifetime....
ReplyDelete