Belief in the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth and belief in the virtue of his teachings are not at all the same thing. Writing to John Adams in 1813, having taken his razor blade to the books of the New Testament and removed all “the artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests,” Thomas Jefferson said the 46-page residue contained “the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man.” Ernest Renan, in his pathbreaking “Life of Jesus” in 1863, also repudiated the idea that Jesus was the son of God while affirming the beauty of his teachings. In rather striking contrast, C. S. Lewis maintained in his classic statement “Mere Christianity”: “That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse.” Continue reading
On this week's show we look at the explosion of literature challenging the traditional views and experiences of faith. We'll look at the backlash against the 'new atheists' provoked by Phillip Pullman's controversial new novel, the Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ. We'll also look at another leading novelist's take on religion, Rebecca Goldstein's, 36 Arguments for the Existence of God. We'll continue the religious debate with a review of Infidel, David Baddiel's new film comedy about mistaken Muslim/Jewish identity. We'll also feature Brian Eno's cultural highlights and get a new cool taste of jazz from the Polar Bears.
Philip Pullman, addressing an audience at the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford, was asked about whether his latest book, The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, was offensive. Here's his reply:
"It was a shocking thing to say and I knew it was a shocking thing to say. But no one has the right to live without being shocked. No one has the right to spend their life without being offended. Nobody has to read this book. Nobody has to pick it up. Nobody has to open it. And if you open it and read it, you don't have to like it. And if you read it and you dislike it, you don't have to remain silent about it. You can write to me, you can complain about it, you can write to the publisher, you can write to the papers, you can write your own book. You can do all those things, but there your rights stop. No one has the right to stop me writing this book. No one has the right to stop it being published, or bought, or sold or read. That's all I have to say on that subject."
. We'll also look at another leading novelist's take on religion, Rebecca Goldstein's, 
. We'll continue the religious debate with a review of 
, was offensive. Here's his reply: