Thursday, October 21, 2010

Glenn Beck: "I haven't seen a half-monkey, half-person yet"


October 20, 2010 on Premiere Radio Network's The Glenn Beck Program
(via Media Matters - Thanks Rich)

38 comments:

  1. altleast the idiot answer his own quistion in the end

    ReplyDelete
  2. Get a mirror Glen. There is your half monkey - less than half person.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unbelievable ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He's obviously never  been to Kansas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This man is an unbelievable moron. He has clearly never READ anything about evolution, he is parroting what he's been told by OTHER people who have also never read anything about it. That anyone LISTENS to this drivel is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Piltdown Man turned out to be a hoax so we should abandon evolution?
    OK Glenn, the Shroud of Turin turned out to be a hoax. When are you abandoning your god?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Turin shroud a hoax?  I hardly think so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What is sadder than Beck is that there are millions who are credulous enough to be influenced by his nonsense. We have religion to thank for that, because if you believe that shit, you will believe ANYTHING!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oskar HolmströmOctober 21, 2010 at 4:31 PM

    It's hard to spot irony in text when nothing about the writer is known so I might have failed to spot yours.
    Otherwise, yes, the shroud is a hoax. The time from when it can be traced in historical records agrees very well with the carbon dating that was made. This time period was one where religios relics were produced in masses.
    So yup, there is no doubt at all that it is a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh the hallarity!  What whit!  Rather than grab the low hanging fruit, you sir went beyond the call of duty and delivered a joke that was in no way obvious to everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  11. he's right. the belief that man came magically from dirt in a garden with a talking snake is much more likely.

    ReplyDelete
  12. omfg!!
    go to school you retarded ass hole!
    the fact that the earth was round wasn't forced? peopled died because of it!!!!!
    the church apologiesd to gallileo 200 years after he first said it.
    go and learn about evolution!
    it's fucking slow! you don't see it happening!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. An absolute disrgace to journalism and the media. Evolution (fact) has nothing to do with whether you believe in a god or not. Accept it, and carry on believing if you have to.

    Someone teach this idiot how to read.

    ReplyDelete
  14. ManCreatedGodCreatedHellOctober 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM

    I think it's funny that he thinks there is only one missing link. He's hoping Lucy will be found to be a hoax, they will still have hundreds of intermediate fossil records to explain. 

    He also completely ignores molecular evidence, which in my opinion makes a stronger case than the fossil record does. 

    ReplyDelete
  15. The church did not apologize to Galileo for saying that the earth is round, but for saying that the earth revolved around the sun, not vice-versa. We atheist need to be up on our history.

    ReplyDelete
  16. andrew....   you're a fucking douchebag.   please stop coming to this website.  seriously. 

    ReplyDelete
  17. andrew just because you agree with his small govt ideas- like i do-you don't have to agree with his stupid statements too...

    ReplyDelete
  18. I hope you are from there like I am so I can fling my poo at you.

    ReplyDelete
  19. It's all just an act, he's only giving his audience exactly what they want to see and hear, inflating both his ego and bank accounts. Pay no attention to the man in front of the curtain.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LOL... andrew is douche who trolls around with his dick-head remarks.  He's even a house hold name in my place!  Andrew Cunt as we call him, the dick-head with a internet connection and nothing to say.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Glenn Beck is not ignorant. He's poisonous.

    He knows he is full of shit, he WANTS to be full of shit, because that crap gives him the spotlight.

    The sooner people stop listening to him, the better off everyone is.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Some here are giving him way too much credit.  He is not as influential as is suggested here.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kansas Board of "Education", Fred Phelps, Ken Ham and his dinosaurs wearing saddles, there's a reason why Kansas should be viewed like it is by the people in the northeast and west coast.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No comment by you on the absolute stupidity of Glenn Beck. Well, silence equals consent - so we can only assume that in your own way, you too are equally as stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  25. You all crack me up.  "Look in the mirror" is about as creative as "Sticks and stones..."  Having standards for comedy does not a Glenn Beck supporter make (although he does provide quite a bit of comedic value, but that's another point entirely).

    My 'trolling' is just the result of me not giving two shits if anyone agrees with me.  Though I don't think anyone here is defending Glenn Beck in this video. I'm just saying that was the lamest most obvious joke anyone could make in response.

    ReplyDelete
  26. <span>molecular evidence and several other evidences support evolution. Even if we would know anything about fossils, the case is still not a case anymore.
    </span>

    ReplyDelete
  27. Even if we would know nothing about fossils, <span>molecular evidence, </span>Homologies, distribution of living things on the globe, observed speciation, etc. would stand in as evidence w/o needing fossils.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Obvious jokes can be funny. But his delivery was off. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  29. God forbid that anyone should be obvious!

    ReplyDelete
  30. The truth is self-evident that Glenn Beck is a prat!

    ReplyDelete
  31. King Asa for PresidentOctober 22, 2010 at 8:32 PM

    "<span>My 'trolling' is just the result of me not giving two shits if anyone agrees with me."</span>

    I agree the joke was obvious but most people simply don't laugh and read on.  You, on the other hand, have to sarcastically point it out.  Given that sarcasm is the lowest form of whit [sic], I question the height of your aforementioned standards.

    You revel in the non-shit -givingness of being an intentional contrarian here.  Since you disagree with Beck on this point, the only way to get a rise out of people in this particular thread is to rag on a Neuro's joke.  A little desperate this time around don't you think?   

    ReplyDelete
  32. Andew's not that bad and I disagree with those that wish him off this board.  That's pretty small minded.  I'm the worst - left wing, bleeding heart, big govt believing atheist - but many times I have really appreciated Andrew's comments/perspectives on the videos posted here.  Ignore 'em Andrew (plus my youngest and smartest kid is named Andrew).

    ReplyDelete
  33. We should strap this bastard into a chair with clamps over his eyes a la Clockwork Orange and make him watch a documentary on how evolution works.

    I don't care that people don't accept evolution, but at least know what it is, and how it is meant to work, before saying something illinformed like "I have never seen a half man half monkey."

    ReplyDelete
  34. that man is producing unbelievable crap by the hour. he's a scientific and moral moron.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Burger boy, 

    There is a difference between listening and learning someone's differing views and having to deal with Andrew's posts.

    He argues for the sake of arguing,  King Asa for President was right on with his post. He has to disagree about something in all of his posts. If he can't find something to disagree with, he then posts a disparaging and negative remark about someone's comment.

    He's not here for a thoughtful discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  36. <p><span>Burger boy,   </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    </p><p><span>There is a difference between listening to and learning from someone's differing views and having to deal with Andrew's posts.  </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    </p><p><span>He argues for the sake of arguing,  King Asa for President was right on with his post. He has to disagree about something in all of his posts. If he can't find something to disagree with, he then posts a disparaging and negative remark about someone's comment.  </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    <span>He's not here for a thoughtful discussion.</span>
    </p>

    ReplyDelete
  37. <p><span>Burger boy,   </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    </p><p><span>There is a difference between listening and learning someone's differing views and having to deal with Andrew's posts.  </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    </p><p><span>He argues for the sake of arguing,  King Asa for President was right on with his post. He has to disagree about something in all of his posts. If he can't find something to disagree with, he then posts a disparaging and negative remark about someone's comment.  </span>
    </p><p><span> </span>
    <span>He's not here for a thoughtful discussion.</span>
    </p>

    ReplyDelete
  38. eh,

    Not true at all.  It's just that when I agree, or like other people's posts, nobody notices.  But when there's a disagreement suddenly it's something that sticks in people's heads.

    ReplyDelete