Tuesday, October 5, 2010

The Daily Show - Sam Harris

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Sam Harris
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorRally to Restore Sanity
October 4, 2010 on The Daily Show (US Only)
Sam Harris wants to begin talking about morality and human values in the context of our growing scientific understanding of the world.
Viewers in Canada can watch it on The Comedy Network
Viewers in other countries can use Hotspot Shield or Modify Headers

24 comments:

  1. Good find.  As was said in the last video's comments, I'm vary warry of Harris' premises and think he's probably wrong, but I'll still give his book a read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why are all the leading pop-culture atheists so hard to like?

    ReplyDelete
  3. A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.
    I do detest the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..

    ReplyDelete
  4. <span>A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.  
    I do detest the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Copelands, Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..</span>

    ReplyDelete
  5. <span>A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.  
    I disagree with theists, but admit a severe dislike of the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Copelands,Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..</span>

    ReplyDelete
  6. <span><span>A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.    
    I only disagree with theists, but admit a severe dislike of the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Copelands,Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..</span></span>

    ReplyDelete
  7. <span><span><span>A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.      
    I merely disagree with theists, but admit to a severe dislike of the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Copelands,Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..</span></span></span>

    ReplyDelete
  8. <span><span><span><span>A big Fan of Sam's, tho haven't been part of "pop-culture" for half a century.        
    I merely disagree with theists, but do admit to a severe dislike of the "pop-culture" theists, tho. The Popoffs, Hinns, Robertsons, Falwells, Comforts, Copelands,Dollars, Haggarts, Swagarts etc..</span></span></span></span>

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bigstupidsmile, I absolutely love the leading pop-culture atheists (four horsemen in particular).  Not sure what in Sam Harris you find hard to like.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think the guys at google gave him a much harder time, and I don't think he was very convincing there either.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It sounds as though Harris has discovered Ethical Calculus, one of the technologies in the game Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri:

    <blockquote><pre><span>Ethical Calculus</span>
    <span>
    <pre>Throughout the history of mankind, philosophers have
    grappled with the question: ‘How shall we then live?’
    {Ethical Calculus} lays down mathematical principles
    uncovered by [Social Psych (B1)] to address this question,
    essentially providing calculations and functions that
    determine appropriate human behavior.</pre></span></pre></blockquote>

    ReplyDelete
  12. <span>
    <pre>It looks as though Harris has discovered Ethical Calculus, one of the technologies in the game Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri:</pre>
    <pre> Ethical Calculus
    Throughout the history of mankind, philosophers have
    grappled with the question: ‘How shall we then live?’
    {Ethical Calculus} lays down mathematical principles
    uncovered by [Social Psych (B1)] to address this question,
    essentially providing calculations and functions that
    determine appropriate human behavior.</pre>
    </span>

    ReplyDelete
  13. “In the best case religion gives people bad reasons to be good
    where good reasons are actually available.” Sam Harris

    ReplyDelete
  14. The book contains praise from Ian McEwan, Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, and Lawrence Krauss. I'd like to see Dan Dennett's comments.
    I've read the Introduction and found it quite interesting. His remarks about the situation in the culture wars are right on target as is his discussion of the general rejection of "moral truth." At this point, he's given no definition of morality or value; hopefully, he'll get to these somewhere. No matter what, I give him credit for working very hard on a serious issue and throwing a baseline document into the New Atheism.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The book contains praise from Ian McEwan, Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, and Lawrence Krauss. I'd like to see Dan Dennett's comments.
    I've read the Introduction and found it quite interesting. His remarks about the situation in the culture wars are right on target as is his discussion of the general rejection of "moral truth." At this point, he's given no definition of morality or value; hopefully, he'll get to these somewhere. No matter what, I give him credit for working very hard on a serious issue and throwing a baseline document into the New Atheism.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm very interested in his arguments as well. It appeals greatly to my biases, so I'm not totally on board with it yet.

    What kind of definition of morality or value are you looking for? Harris seems to put forward a definition of morality that is objective but fuzzy and inexact. Something about the fuzziness and imprecision feels inadequate, but I wonder whether this is just a consequence of being accustomed to religious/absolutist conceptions of morality, or of an aversion anything resembling the shifty babble of postmodern relativism.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks for the Google video. I look forward to a tough audience. (I agree with Sam on this thesis, but I want it to be taken seriously and questioned rigorously.)

    At the Edge conference on the Science of Morality (2010) he also got a good questioning from researchers into morality. That video series also gives quite a nice overview of some of the scientific research being done on morality at the moment.  Very exciting stuff.

    http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/morality10/morality10_index.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks for the Google video; I look forward to a tough audience. (I agree with Sam on his thesis, but I'd like for it to be taken seriously and questioned rigorously.)

    At the Edge conference on the Science of Morality (2010) there was also an intense Q&A after Sam's presentation. It's also a great place to get an overview of some of the scientific research being done on morality at the moment. Very exciting stuff.

    http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/morality10/morality10_index.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm hoping that he gets to how one measures happiness.  That's the real kicker, as if each individual has to measure their own happiness... well, I'll save it until I've read the book when it gets delivered.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Another great source on the question of atheistic morality is Richard Carrier. He fleshes out his ideas in these videos:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNMUz1iediU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dce8mE0q4zA

    (There's also his books, of course.)

    If you want to jump straight to the "Is from an Ought" question, go here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GkE1TxMRzU#t=2m32s

    ReplyDelete
  21. Too bad he didn't think to point out Iran or any of the other wealthy oil countries as non "failed states" that treat women as cattle.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Is it just me, or was Jon kind of a dick about the slavery in scripture thing?

    ReplyDelete