Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Attorney Roger Jon Diamond vs. Fox & Friends Over Prayers Referencing Jesus at City Council Meetings


May 18, 2010 on Fox & Friends

9 comments:

  1. Roger Jon Diamond clearly presented solid arguments, but why do I get the feeling they just went through one ear and out the other?

    ReplyDelete
  2. At least they followed up on this story... cause the other time it was one-sided (no opponent). This is better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. it seems like every time they interview someone Fox asks, "why are you against prayer??" They have to keep on being corrected that it's only specific prayers in regards to a certain religion (in this case, Christianity).

    Diamond really nailed them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How many times we gonna have to explain the law to theses morons of Fox News?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Curch / State separation was one of the most important innovations this country ever created. Don't they get it that the very same law that grants them freedom of religion is the same law that removes it from the government? The moment the government endorses one religion over another you have lost freedom of religion (and from religion).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey, you guys are participating of the "Draw Muhammad Day"? I am. =)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Shit its tough to listen to the faux news Morons. I grit my teeth and listen and shake my head and try to understand WTF happened to these people!

    PS How do you particpate in the draw Mohammed day?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Preying on Prayers"... that definitely showed where Fox News already stood on the issues.  Instead of posting something that simply explains what's happening, they chose one to show that takes up one side over the other.  Fox News isn't after investigating both sides, they are interested in supporting their shared conservative beliefs.  

    Also, I hate hearing how the US is a "Christian nation" all the time.  Lets give them the benefit of the doubt and say, "Okay, perhaps it was at the beginning."  But even if that was the case at first, times change and the Government should change with them.  Just because something was done at one point doesn't automatically make it correct forever.  We use to have slaves and women didn't have rights, that was part of our history and past but that doesn't mean it's automatically correct forever.  

    I actually wrote about this coming from a different angle if anyone is interested.  You can read it here on my blog.

    www.willquestion.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow, you all really have it out to stop free speech, dont you?  why cant others have beliefs that you dont agree with and the opportunity to share it with others who believe as they do? seems reasonable to me.

    ReplyDelete