Your daily source of news & videos on science & religion since 2007
This guy again? Didn't he get destroyed a few years back by Harris?<span> </span>
Well, these guys usually don't even realize when they are being destroyed, and so seem to have no qualms about coming back again and again with the exact same bullshit.
Steve Carell
Gosh I wouldn´t giving that Wolpe guy a good wollop. He´s incredibly loud..he shouts and shouts, I´m suprised Rupert Murdoch hasn´t hired him.
In ALMOST all religion debates I've listened to, the person who is wrong is also the person speaking very loudly.
And usually the non-religious debater sounds vaguely bored, understandbly, with answering the same inane and unsupportable suppositions over and over.
Stop talking over each other. Aaahhh...
I do sometimes get the impression that in many cases both sides of the debate like to debate and re-debate, in order to keep the publicity going.Having said that, I think there's no disadvantage to having the debate continue, especially as long as we are holding the minority position.
This guy again? Didn't he get destroyed a few years back by Harris?<span> </span>
ReplyDeleteWell, these guys usually don't even realize when they are being destroyed, and so seem to have no qualms about coming back again and again with the exact same bullshit.
ReplyDeleteSteve Carell
ReplyDeleteGosh I wouldn´t giving that Wolpe guy a good wollop. He´s incredibly loud..he shouts and shouts, I´m suprised Rupert Murdoch hasn´t hired him.
ReplyDeleteIn ALMOST all religion debates I've listened to, the person who is wrong is also the person speaking very loudly.
ReplyDeleteAnd usually the non-religious debater sounds vaguely bored, understandbly, with answering the same inane and unsupportable suppositions over and over.
ReplyDeleteStop talking over each other. Aaahhh...
ReplyDeleteI do sometimes get the impression that in many cases both sides of the debate like to debate and re-debate, in order to keep the publicity going.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I think there's no disadvantage to having the debate continue, especially as long as we are holding the minority position.